Patients with stage II esophageal cancer have cancer that invades into or through the muscular wall of the esophagus, but not into nearby local structures (IIA). When there is regional lymph node involvement with any extent of primary cancer but no invasion of local structures, this is called stage IIB. Stage II cancer may also be referred to as locally advanced.
A variety of factors ultimately influence a patient’s decision to receive treatment of cancer. The purpose of receiving cancer treatment may be to improve symptoms through local control of the cancer, increase a patient’s chance of cure, or prolong a patient’s survival. The potential benefits of receiving cancer treatment must be carefully balanced with the potential risks of receiving cancer treatment.
You are not alone—The CancerConnect Esophageal Cancer Community is the leading Social Media Application for Esophageal Cancer patients and caregivers seeking information, inspiration, and support in the wake of a cancer diagnosis. With over 50,000 members the network offers patients and caregivers a thriving community to support the many ongoing needs from diagnosis to survivorship. Login or register here.
The following is a general overview of the treatment of stage II esophageal cancer. Circumstances unique to your situation and prognostic factors of your cancer may ultimately influence how these general treatment principles are applied to your situation. The information on this Web site is intended to help educate you about your treatment options and to facilitate a mutual or shared decision-making process with your treating cancer physician.
Most new treatments are developed in clinical trials. Clinical trials are studies that evaluate the effectiveness of new drugs or treatment strategies. The development of more effective cancer treatments requires that new and innovative therapies be evaluated with cancer patients. Participation in a clinical trial may offer access to better treatments and advance the existing knowledge about treatment of this cancer. Clinical trials are available for most stages of cancer. Patients who are interested in participating in a clinical trial should discuss the risks and benefits of clinical trials with their physician. To ensure that you are receiving the optimal treatment of your cancer, it is important to stay informed and follow the cancer news in order to learn about new treatments and the results of clinical trials.
Optimal treatment of patients with stage II esophageal cancer often requires more than one therapeutic approach. Thus, it is important for patients to be treated at a medical center that can offer multi-modality treatment involving surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, medical gastroenterologists and nutritionists.
Patients with stage II esophageal cancer can be treated with curative intent using either a primary surgical or a primary combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy approach. However, combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy is usually reserved for patients who are not able or do not wish to undergo major surgery. There have been no clinical studies directly comparing combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy with surgery alone for the treatment of patients with stage II esophageal cancer. However, the American Society of Radiology has published guidelines for the treatment of stages I-III esophageal cancer and currently recommends surgery alone as the best treatment for patients with stage II esophageal cancer.
Generally, patients with stage IIB cancer involving the lymph nodes have a worse prognosis than patients with stage IIA cancer without lymph node involvement. Survival of patients with stage IIB is also related to the number of lymph nodes involved with cancer.
Primary Treatment with Surgery Alone
It is difficult to get accurate information about outcomes for patients with stage II esophageal cancer, as most published clinical studies have pooled together the results of patients with stage I-III cancer. In one large clinical study of 160 patients, the average survival duration was 11 months following treatment with surgery alone. In another study involving 110 patients with squamous cell cancer and 124 with adenocarcinoma, the average survival was 16 months, the 5-year survival rate was 20% and 6% of patients died from complications of surgery. The results of this trial indicate that in general, patients with stage IIA cancer experience a better than 20% survival and patients with stage IIB cancer experience a slightly worse outcome. In one study from Japan, the average survival of 14 patients with stage II esophageal cancer following surgery alone was 25 months. To learn more about surgery, go to Surgery and Cancer of the Esophagus.
Neoadjuvant Therapy (Treatment before Surgery)
Chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy administered prior to surgery is referred to as neoadjuvant therapy. In theory, neoadjuvant therapy can decrease the size of the cancer, making it easier to remove with surgery. The major problems with this approach are the higher mortality rates that occur when radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy are administered before surgery and the delay of surgery for some patients who do not respond to therapy. In most but not all studies, chemotherapy alone, radiation therapy alone or both therapies delivered before surgery have not consistently improved survival following surgery in patients with stage II esophageal cancer. Many current clinical trials are directed at improving outcomes of patients with stage II esophageal cancer by administering newer neoadjuvant treatment regimens containing taxane-based chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy.
In one large clinical trial evaluating neoadjuvant treatment, 300 patients with stage I-II squamous esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone or chemotherapy and radiation therapy before surgery. There were fewer recurrences of cancer in patients treated with radiation therapy and chemotherapy before surgery. However, this benefit was balanced out by an increase in deaths following surgery in patients who had received chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The average survival was 1.5 years for both groups. Survival at 3 years was approximately 35% for both groups. The presence of lymph node involvement (stage IIB) was associated with a poor outcome, as was the inability to surgically remove all cancer.
In another clinical trial, paclitaxel, Paraplatin® and fluorouracil chemotherapy were given with radiation therapy to 73 patients with localized (stage I-III) esophageal cancer. Eighty-one percent of all patients underwent surgery and 95% of these had complete resection of all visible cancer. Fifty-four percent of patients undergoing surgery had a complete pathological response, 18% had cancer visible only under the microscope and 32% had residual cancer. A complete pathological response means that no cancer cells were present in the resected cancer specimen. A complete clinical response was observed in 7 of the 14 patients not undergoing surgery. Survival at one year for all patients was 69%, with 50% of patients alive at two years. There were no treatment-related deaths during the chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but 10% of patients died from surgical complications. These results showed that paclitaxel, Paraplatin® and fluorouracil was a very active drug combination producing a complete clinical and pathologic response in half the patients. However, the 10% death rate following surgery is high and it is unclear what role surgery contributed to overall survival.
With the development of new chemotherapy regimens there will continue to be new clinical trials of neoadjuvant therapy performed in patients with stage II cancer of the esophagus undergoing esophagectomy. The goal of these trials is to develop an effective regimen of chemotherapy and radiation therapy that does not increase the death rate following surgery, but increases survival.
Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment
Researchers have also evaluated the combination of neoadjuvant low-dose chemotherapy prior to surgery followed by additional adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. In the largest clinical trial published, 440 patients with stage II-IV esophageal cancer received treatment with surgery alone or with low-dose neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and additional chemotherapy. One year following treatment, the survival rate was 59% for those who received chemotherapy and 60% for those who had surgery alone; at 2 years, survival was 35% and 37%, respectively. In this clinical trial, pre-operative chemotherapy with a combination of Platinol® and fluorouracil did not improve overall survival among patients with squamous or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus compared to treatment with surgery alone.
Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy as Primary Treatment
Patients with stage II esophageal cancer who cannot or who do not want to undergo surgery may be treated with combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Chemotherapy consists of anti-cancer drugs that have the ability to kill cancer cells. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy may act together to increase the destruction of cancer cells. The results of several clinical studies using concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy in esophageal cancer patients have suggested that this strategy may improve remission rates and prolong survival. However, there have been no clinical studies directly comparing combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy with surgery alone for the treatment of patients with stage II esophageal cancer.
In one clinical trial, stage II esophageal cancer patients who received combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy experienced a 5-year survival rate of 20% with local cancer recurrences occurring in 45% of patients. In another clinical trial, 129 patients with stage II and III esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to receive radiation therapy alone or radiation therapy and chemotherapy. The majority of patients had squamous cell cancer and approximately 70% had stage II cancer of the esophagus. Chemotherapy consisted of the combination Platinol® and fluorouracil. The combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy treatment was associated with a 5-year survival of 27%, compared to 0% for patients receiving radiation therapy alone. The number of local recurrences and distant relapses were fewer in patients receiving combined therapy than in patients receiving radiation therapy alone. The results of this trial indicate that the survival of stage II patients receiving combined therapy is slightly better than 20% and that survival of patients with stage III cancer receiving combined therapy would be worse.